Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 04:52:32 12/02/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 02, 1998 at 06:44:11, blass uri wrote: >I think that no program can find Nxf2 >The tactical idea is too deep for programs. > >You can try to prove that the sacrifice is wrong by suggesting a better defence >for white but I remember that I analyzed it before some years with Genius3 >and it understood that black was better only many plies after Nxf2 > >Uri Thats the whole point, if you analyse that game, then yes Nxf2 is a winning move. But if black played that move against another player then no, I do not think the game would have lead to black winning. Blacks move was correct for that game, but it was the wrong move, and it was only made correct by white stupid moves later on in the game. By what you are saying if understand you correctly, is that after Nxf2, no matter what or who played white, Black still would have won that game. If that is what you are saying then I totally disagree with you. You might want to try one of todays programs to analyse it and see if you get the same results, and if you do, then I would very much like to see it. In my view at that stage of the game Nxf2 was the wrong move, and black only won that game due to white's stupid moves later on in the game.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.