Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Symbolic: code example

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 10:55:47 01/24/04

Go up one level in this thread


On January 24, 2004 at 09:59:40, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>I am not sure what "statements" you are referring to.  If you find it easy to
>read someone else's Lisp code, then that's good.  However, on many occasions I
>found myself having to work on something someone else wrote, I never found Lisp
>to be the easiest kind of program to work on.
>
>If you disagree, that's fine by me...

I have often found an inverse relation between what is good in the long run and
what is easy here and now.

I don't know Lisp at all, but it could be one of those things you really grow to
love _if_ you can be open minded enough to get past that initial resentment.

-S.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.