Author: Chessfun
Date: 13:22:56 01/25/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 25, 2004 at 16:17:31, Thorsten Czub wrote: >why don't you give them 1" for the whole game instead of 3' ?? > >IMO your results would be more "precise" and the data would be more serious and >you could produce more data to get more serious and valuable statistics. > >or better: lets compute them 1 ms ! per game. > >or let the game played in sero seconds. and adjudicate the results before they >have happened. this way you could say: i played 3000 games and shredder8 won >67 %. > >i cannot post the games because the time out was before the first move began. I do play 1' 1" inc games as you well know. I don't typically play 3/0 but did so after seeing your post which stated Hiarcs 9 + agg + hyp to be stronger at blitz. The 3/0 was the same as the post you replied too as was the number of games. In this case the pc is roughly 4x stronger so you could read them as 10 min games ;-) You could have drawn any amount of conclusions you wanted to originally to the first poster instead of waiting for another set of results and some more complaints. What good are your games on the CB server playing against programs without a clue as to the cpu strength. That is simply more nonsense from you. Oh you have your 2 sec inc maybe....pah Sarah.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.