Author: Chessfun
Date: 14:34:24 01/25/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 25, 2004 at 17:24:24, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On January 25, 2004 at 16:24:13, Chessfun wrote: > >>No indeed, that's clear proof of your testing methods and results ?! ;-) >> >>Sarah. > > >testing methods ? > >the method is to let the program RUN. thats all. >the rest is done by the program. > >testing a prg is something else. These games on the CB server are the reason you give for Hiarcs 9 being stronger than Shredder 8 at blitz. Obviously something must make you or give you this impression and if it's only these server games that give you this conclusion, wouldn't you call it a testing method? Again I quote "hiarcs9 is not weaker then s8. especially not on blitz. try h9 in agg+hyp or other settings." Does this not suggest you have tested this since you state it as fact?. And, fact is all you have is a few server games on unequal hardware. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.