Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 16:06:31 01/25/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 25, 2004 at 17:48:43, Jorge Pichard wrote: >If HIARCS X play against Peter Svidler in an FRC match of 5 games of 60 min per >sides who do you think it will win? Please provide a logical explanation of your >supporting argument. Most probably Hiarcs maybe a tie. Arguments: 1. 60 minutes per side favors the computer since its rapid chess. 2. FRC is especially hard for humans against computers since they can not choose from a wide and deep opening theory and so it will be harder for them to get the position out of the opening they need to defeat the computer . 3.) Humans are familiar with certain patterns and can evaluate a related position quite accurate. These patterns are less likely to occur in FRC or at least the chance that the position looks familiar but in fact is different is higher. regards Joachim P.S.: It is my personal opinion, that without the advantage in the opening humans will have difficulties to win a match (but they might still draw it).
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.