Author: Chessfun
Date: 02:50:55 01/26/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2004 at 05:42:22, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On January 25, 2004 at 18:59:29, Thomas Mayer wrote: > >>But we are discussing here about strength. Strength resists in results, not in >>playing style. > >the results must make sense. When you reduce the time in blitz games, the end >results makes not much sense . > >>You claim that Hiarcs 9 agg+hyp is best in blitz - > >i claim that agg+hyp is better. >for the best setting, you would need to finetune some more parameters. but the >parameters in hiarcs are limited to only a few things. this way you cannot setup >the parameters accurate. > > >>now Sarah post some games >>where it was shreddered by Shredder 8 (which is not that good in blitz like we >>all know - look at results e.g. Heinz Walz had - or the comparisson of blitz and >>active time controls at the CSS-ratinglists) >i do not believe those results are right. >if shredder would be so good in blitz (shreddered - as you call it) the people >with faster hardware and shredder8 would win against me. >but they do not. >so something is wrong with the results sarah posts. > >who knows, maybe one program has PB on and the other not, or the resources are >splitted in the wrong way, i don't know. Just to confirm. Neither had PB on as we all know if you even tried you would receive a warning asking "do you really want this". The games are posted, the evals are there to be seen as are the times for each move. Please feel free to examine the games with your copies of both programs and you can confirm for yourself that the moves are correct. Also please feel free to run your own set of 30 games as others have posting very similar results. http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?344827 http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?344831 We await your games eagerly ;-) Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.