Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 03:18:08 01/26/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2004 at 06:00:28, Uri Blass wrote: >It is not an accusation because it is about games that you did not post and it >was only to make sure that you do not post only part of them. Aha . bravo. and my "accusation" was also not an accusation. it was a question with 2 ?? at the end of the sentence. a request :-)) >I am not talking specifically about you but it is not always the case. >Posting part of the games without mentioning it is not a direct lie so only if >you claim that you posted all games and people still do not believe you then you >can say that they accuse you of cheating. > >I think that Sarah only wanted to verify that if you post games you post all of >them. >I do not think that she meant to say that you were lying about something. ok. >It is clear that if somebody want to post part of the games and claim that he >posted all of them he can do it so if she assume that you are going to lie and >post part of the games then there is no reason for her to ask you to post all >games. this sentence is to long for my memory :-)) >Your last question made the impression that you suspect that she posted only >part of the games. >If you do not suspect it then the following question is not relevant >"is this implying that YOU did NOT post all games INCLUDING all losses ??" ok - i see this is all very complicate to communicate about. I saw between the lines, due to the part where she asks for ALL games an accusation. Because it is NORMAL when you run a test-match, that you post ALL games. you only post ONE game when you want to give an EXAMPLE.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.