Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: ELO 2700 or stupid?

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 04:56:48 01/26/04

Go up one level in this thread


On January 25, 2004 at 14:40:57, Ricardo Gibert wrote:

>On January 25, 2004 at 10:27:41, Djordje Vidanovic wrote:
>
>>On January 25, 2004 at 10:24:31, Djordje Vidanovic wrote:
>>
>>>On January 25, 2004 at 10:16:49, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>
>>>>On January 25, 2004 at 09:19:25, Harald Faber wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Looks like an easy one because the tbs are near:
>>>>>
>>>>>[D]7b/8/kq6/8/8/1N2R3/K2P4/8 w - - 0 1</FONT>
>>>>>
>>>>>White to move and draw.
>>>>>But the so-called ELO giants are helpless unless the first move is played on the
>>>>>board. But then within seconds they calculate the idea.
>>>>
>>>>Latest Movei without tablebases finds Nd4 very fast(about 2 seconds on A1000).
>>>>
>>>>No tablebases are used and movei does not evaluate the position correctly
>>>>because it does not know to evaluate KB vs KP.
>>>>
>>>>Uri
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Isn't Re6 the drawing move?
>>
>>
>>Sorry, stupid of me.  Just took a look, the queen takes the rook and the knight
>>can't move.  Now, that I took a _good_ look, Nd4 is _the_ move.
>
>My brain is similarly defective. It's human.  ;-)

My brain is smart enough to understand that Re6 cannot be a drawing move that
programs miss so after thinking about it, the next thought is what is my error
and I find in few seconds that after Re6 Qxe6 the knight is pinned.

Also in a practical game
I immediately suspect that there can be a trap before playing a move that wins
material.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.