Author: Matthew Hull
Date: 12:56:23 01/26/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2004 at 15:47:56, Robert Hyatt wrote: >This is probably the best result I have ever seen from Crafty. I am simply >running some "sanity checks" to make sure everything is functioning, after a few >recent changes. Here is my first test, WAC at 1 second per move: > >total positions searched.......... 300 >number right...................... 299 >number wrong...................... 1 >percentage right.................. 99 >percentage wrong.................. 0 >total nodes searched.............. 109706792 >average search depth.............. 4.6 >nodes per second.................. 6522401 > >It misses #230. > >I re-compiled with Dann's favorite -DDETECTDRAW and at one second per move, >blasted out the following result: > >total positions searched.......... 300 >number right...................... 300 >number wrong...................... 0 >percentage right.................. 100 >percentage wrong.................. 0 >total nodes searched.............. 103251953 >average search depth.............. 4.5 >nodes per second.................. 5713998 > >I will try to run some other tests as I continue looking at things. I am also >once again experimenting with the -DFUTILITY stuff that Jeramiah wrote, to see >how it affects things on this really monster box. > >BTW for those that have asked, "crafty" is playing on ICC most of this week >using this box. Scrappy is running on my normal dual xeon 2.8 all the time... How much higher than 4-way do they stack the chips in this series of machine?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.