Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 18:46:23 01/26/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2004 at 17:53:15, enrico carrisco wrote: >On January 26, 2004 at 16:06:13, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On January 26, 2004 at 15:59:59, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>On January 26, 2004 at 15:47:56, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>This is probably the best result I have ever seen from Crafty. I am simply >>>>running some "sanity checks" to make sure everything is functioning, after a few >>>>recent changes. Here is my first test, WAC at 1 second per move: >>>> >>>>total positions searched.......... 300 >>>>number right...................... 299 >>>>number wrong...................... 1 >>>>percentage right.................. 99 >>>>percentage wrong.................. 0 >>>>total nodes searched.............. 109706792 >>>>average search depth.............. 4.6 >>>>nodes per second.................. 6522401 >>>> >>>>It misses #230. >>>> >>>>I re-compiled with Dann's favorite -DDETECTDRAW and at one second per move, >>>>blasted out the following result: >>>> >>>>total positions searched.......... 300 >>>>number right...................... 300 >>>>number wrong...................... 0 >>>>percentage right.................. 100 >>>>percentage wrong.................. 0 >>>>total nodes searched.............. 103251953 >>>>average search depth.............. 4.5 >>>>nodes per second.................. 5713998 >>>> >>>>I will try to run some other tests as I continue looking at things. I am also >>>>once again experimenting with the -DFUTILITY stuff that Jeramiah wrote, to see >>>>how it affects things on this really monster box. >>>> >>>>BTW for those that have asked, "crafty" is playing on ICC most of this week >>>>using this box. Scrappy is running on my normal dual xeon 2.8 all the time... >>> >>> >>> >>>I love you as a scientist, buddy, but how will you do as a participant at the >>>CTG6? You are doing a good job in training your own opponents IMO. But this is >>>the most decent I've seen for years here around! I wish that Crafty still takes >>>the event in passing by. You deserved it. Fingers crossed. :) >>> >>>Rolf >> >> >>You mean the actual event? >> >>Hint: Crafty will _not_ be using the same book I am playing with on ICC right >>now. :) That's all I'll say. Except that it will not be using a commercial >>book either. :) > >You'll need to send that book over for inspection immediately. >My email address is.... ;) > >-elc. I'll mail it to you Sunday night. :) My old Cray Blitz book partner is coming down Wednesday for a day or two of book tuning. Like the good old days. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.