Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 22:12:29 01/26/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2004 at 22:52:57, Mike Byrne wrote: >source: http://www.chessgenius.com/palm/faq.htm > >test position > >[d] R5Nk/7p/4pbpP/n1p4n/2p1b3/K1p3pq/8/8 w - - 0 > > >ChessGenius Preferences set to: >ARM engine, Hash table 64KB, Players set to "Analyze game", Level set to "Time >per move". Analysis set to "line+score+cnt." > >The time for ChessGenius to announce mate in 6 with Rb8 was measured. > > >Model Seconds to solve Positions pos/sec > (smaller is better) searched > >Tungsten C 44 3195490 72,624 > >Tungsten T3 >(with T3 update patch) 44 3195490 72,624 > >Tungsten T3 ** 55 3195490 58,100 > >Sony Clie nx70v 116 3195490 27,547 > >Sony Clie NX-60 125 3195490 25,563 > >Zire 71 148 3195490 21,591 > >Tungsten E 155 3195490 20,616 > >Zire 21 171 3195490 18,687 > >(new) >Dell Axim 400 Mhz >o/c to 597 Mhz 31 3195490 103,080 > >** The Palm Tungsten T3 (without patch) with the standard engine searches 2870 >positions per second on this position. The ARM engine is 20 times faster. this is a nice benchmark. But the results of the Dell Axim are "tuned" :-)) i know that you can overclock the Tungsten T3 too. I guess they would then be at the same speed again. But what is the price of the tungsten T3 (349 Euro) compared to that of the dell axim??
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.