Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 04:11:46 01/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2004 at 06:23:36, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On January 27, 2004 at 03:50:08, Daniel Clausen wrote: > >>Comments? Ideas? Shrieking epitaphs? > >Unless I've missed a posting here presenting actual evidence of foul play by >Reul, I consider that presumption of innocence is a better approach. That depends on where the burden of proof lies. With all the open source programs out there it is all too easy to clone so in this case I think the burden is, if not reversed then, at least shared. More importantly though, questions were asked but not answered. To me that raises the doubt. -S. > Hence I >have no qualms using and abusing the engine for my own personal use. And one >never know, evidence might turn up. Given of course that this the championship >engine. > >Regards, >Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.