Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 04:21:53 01/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2004 at 11:10:55, Tord Romstad wrote: >Yes. That is why I don't do this at all nodes, but only when the evaluation >function reports that the current position is "sufficiently close to >quiescent" that it is safe to rely on the relatively simple SEE. > >Consider the simplest possible example: > >Assume that the side to move has no hanging, pinned or overloaded pieces, >and that the opponent has an undefended hanging piece. If the static >eval plus the value of the hanging piece is considerably bigger than >beta, it is reasonably safe to return beta. This works even with >a very simple SEE. Tord, I am probably doing something similar, to be sure can you demonstrate the above with a (diagram) example? Thanks in advance. My best, Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.