Author: Chesster Fritz
Date: 05:04:07 01/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2004 at 01:20:18, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On January 26, 2004 at 16:50:13, Chesster Fritz wrote: >>I'm sorry, but unless you can show proofs, it's only your word, nothing more. > >exactly. and my eyes have seen the games and my hdd has the games. > >>And yes, you do need to put your money where your mouth is. > >:-)) > >for communcation it needs 2 people: sender and receiver. > >>I have no access to your data, no one other than yourself, has access to your >>data. We're suppose to just take you at your word? > >that is really not my problem :-) > >>Sorry, that just doesn't fly, with me or anyone else. > >and ? IMO it is completely unimportant. I don't want to convince you. >you are an anon, right ? >anons can be happy to have access to the net :-)) How about for everyone else, Like Sarah Bird and anyone else that might like to look at the data? Sarah inparticular....you show no proof and call her work crap. The simple fact is, you're all talk, and I'm anonymous to idiots like you! P.S. I ran a match against H9 with S8 and S8 beat your settings HANDS DOWN...you'll just have to take my *Word* for it. P.S. I've known you for years on the net, and know that you're not someone people can have a logical conversation with. Indeed it takes two to communicate, you can't!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.