Author: Mike Byrne
Date: 05:10:27 01/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2004 at 01:12:29, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On January 26, 2004 at 22:52:57, Mike Byrne wrote: > >>source: http://www.chessgenius.com/palm/faq.htm >> >>test position >> >>[d] R5Nk/7p/4pbpP/n1p4n/2p1b3/K1p3pq/8/8 w - - 0 >> >> >>ChessGenius Preferences set to: >>ARM engine, Hash table 64KB, Players set to "Analyze game", Level set to "Time >>per move". Analysis set to "line+score+cnt." >> >>The time for ChessGenius to announce mate in 6 with Rb8 was measured. >> >> >>Model Seconds to solve Positions pos/sec >> (smaller is better) searched >> >>Tungsten C 44 3195490 72,624 >> >>Tungsten T3 >>(with T3 update patch) 44 3195490 72,624 >> >>Tungsten T3 ** 55 3195490 58,100 >> >>Sony Clie nx70v 116 3195490 27,547 >> >>Sony Clie NX-60 125 3195490 25,563 >> >>Zire 71 148 3195490 21,591 >> >>Tungsten E 155 3195490 20,616 >> >>Zire 21 171 3195490 18,687 >> >>(new) >>Dell Axim 400 Mhz >>o/c to 597 Mhz 31 3195490 103,080 >> >>** The Palm Tungsten T3 (without patch) with the standard engine searches 2870 >>positions per second on this position. The ARM engine is 20 times faster. > >this is a nice benchmark. >But the results of the Dell Axim are "tuned" :-)) i know that you can overclock >the Tungsten T3 too. I guess they would then be at the same speed again. >But what is the price of the tungsten T3 (349 Euro) compared to that of the dell >axim?? I purchased a refurb Axim for $229 plus tax and shipping - refurb units come with same warranty as new -
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.