Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 05:53:54 01/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2004 at 08:10:27, Mike Byrne wrote: >>>ChessGenius Preferences set to: >>>ARM engine, Hash table 64KB, Players set to "Analyze game", Level set to "Time >>>per move". Analysis set to "line+score+cnt." >>> >>>The time for ChessGenius to announce mate in 6 with Rb8 was measured. >>> >>> >>>Model Seconds to solve Positions pos/sec >>> (smaller is better) searched >>> >>>Tungsten C 44 3195490 72,624 >>> >>>Tungsten T3 >>>(with T3 update patch) 44 3195490 72,624 >>> >>>Tungsten T3 ** 55 3195490 58,100 >>> >>>Sony Clie nx70v 116 3195490 27,547 >>> >>>Sony Clie NX-60 125 3195490 25,563 >>> >>>Zire 71 148 3195490 21,591 >>> >>>Tungsten E 155 3195490 20,616 >>> >>>Zire 21 171 3195490 18,687 I wonder why the zire21 is slower then the Tungsten E. I thought they both run at 126 or 128 mhz. Strange. Maybe it was used different hash table sizes ? >>>(new) >>>Dell Axim 400 Mhz >>>o/c to 597 Mhz 31 3195490 103,080 this is indeed fast. >I purchased a refurb Axim for $229 plus tax and shipping - refurb units come >with same warranty as new - cool. this is really interesting. oh man. i will never solve the decision which palm or handheld. I like the zire21, the zire 71 and the tungsten E. The zire 21 has the advantage that is is cheap and works longer with the same amount of energy. The zire 71 has a nice display and is faster. but only 16 MB ram. When the tungsten E has a bigger memory (and is less expensive due to no camera). its all very complicated. i change my decision 4 times a day.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.