Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 07:20:04 01/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2004 at 08:00:03, Daniel Clausen wrote: >But the fact that not only _many_ filenames but also quite a lot of (nontrivial) >symbol names in the engine (which can be obtained with the Unix-command >'strings' vor example) together with the fact that he didn't react _at all_ to >the reasonable suggestions from the responsibles in Graz (like meet Dr. A. Heinz >a week later etc) are _IMHO_ some basis to be at least sceptical. I'll leave the programming evidence to those that know best. However, I'm a bit sceptical about similarity of filenames and symbol names. A thorough search of available engines would probably reveal a good deal of common "inspiration", which probably vanishes over time. As for the meeting, I would probably refuse if given the same choice. Especially if the allogation were as flimsical as I think it appears to be. It doesn't say anything whatsoever of guilt. But I'll grant you scepticism nonetheless :-). >If I say that 'List is a non-engine' for me, that doesn't mean I say he's >guilty. (I would need clear evidence for that, and what I know so far is not >enough proof IMHO) It means that I treat List as if it's non-existant at all. Discussing a non-entity passes the time as well I suppose :-). Regards, Mogens
This page took 0.03 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.