Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 09:10:41 01/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2004 at 11:40:38, Thao Tak-Sen wrote: >Hello Robert, > >Crafty has everything in the code,i doubt why it does not attain the level of >top programs?programs like Fritz,Shredder etc >is there anything to be implemented,if so,whats it? >seems you have implemented everything in crafty's code >please tell us,what's in your "to do list"? Crafty needs several things. 1. Better evaluation tuning. I simply have not invested the time in this to optimize the scoring well enough. 2. No forward pruning except for null-move and futility. I haven't given this aspect a lot of thought as I have been more interested in the parallel programming issues. 3. Better evaluation, period. It knows a lot about chess. And particularly about endings. There is still much to do here and I add things as I have time and see a problem.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.