Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 09:12:14 01/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2004 at 12:09:25, Larry Scott wrote: >On January 27, 2004 at 11:57:13, George Tsavdaris wrote: > >>On January 27, 2004 at 11:40:38, Thao Tak-Sen wrote: >> >>>Hello Robert, >>> >>>Crafty has everything in the code,i doubt why it does not attain the level of >>>top programs?programs like Fritz,Shredder etc >> >> As Crafty's code is free then all the others can see the ideas on it and >>make improvements based on it or add these ideas to their program. That's the >>fate of every open source project. So it can't be the best of the top. But >>despite the available code it is one of the best engines around. That's a big >>achievement. >> >>>is there anything to be implemented,if so,whats it? >>>seems you have implemented everything in crafty's code >>>please tell us,what's in your "to do list"? > > > Your Statement's are completely rediculous, if the top programs copied the >Ideals of Crafty then they would play as Badly as Crafty does, Crafty is not a >Top program cause it's programmer is not as gifted as the others plain and >simple. When someone writes "rediculous" I know it is off to a bad start. However, I could certainly point out several ideas that commercial programs were not doing years ago and are doing now. Once you learn how to spell and communicate reasonably, that is.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.