Author: george
Date: 09:55:26 01/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2004 at 08:53:54, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On January 27, 2004 at 08:10:27, Mike Byrne wrote: > >>>>ChessGenius Preferences set to: >>>>ARM engine, Hash table 64KB, Players set to "Analyze game", Level set to "Time >>>>per move". Analysis set to "line+score+cnt." >>>> >>>>The time for ChessGenius to announce mate in 6 with Rb8 was measured. >>>> >>>> >>>>Model Seconds to solve Positions pos/sec >>>> (smaller is better) searched >>>> >>>>Tungsten C 44 3195490 72,624 >>>> >>>>Tungsten T3 >>>>(with T3 update patch) 44 3195490 72,624 >>>> >>>>Tungsten T3 ** 55 3195490 58,100 >>>> >>>>Sony Clie nx70v 116 3195490 27,547 >>>> >>>>Sony Clie NX-60 125 3195490 25,563 >>>> >>>>Zire 71 148 3195490 21,591 >>>> >>>>Tungsten E 155 3195490 20,616 >>>> >>>>Zire 21 171 3195490 18,687 > >I wonder why the zire21 is slower then the Tungsten E. I thought they both run >at 126 or 128 mhz. >Strange. >Maybe it was used different hash table sizes ? > >>>>(new) >>>>Dell Axim 400 Mhz >>>>o/c to 597 Mhz 31 3195490 103,080 > >this is indeed fast. > > >>I purchased a refurb Axim for $229 plus tax and shipping - refurb units come >>with same warranty as new - > >cool. this is really interesting. >oh man. i will never solve the decision which palm or handheld. > >I like the zire21, the zire 71 and the tungsten E. > >The zire 21 has the advantage that is is cheap and works longer with >the same amount of energy. > >The zire 71 has a nice display and is faster. but only 16 MB ram. >When the tungsten E has a bigger memory (and is less expensive due to no >camera). > >its all very complicated. > >i change my decision 4 times a day. my pocket frirz 2 solves that position in 20 seconds...anyway...what overclock program do u use???? thangs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.