Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 11:53:44 01/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2004 at 08:04:07, Chesster Fritz wrote: >How about for everyone else, Like Sarah Bird and anyone else that might like to >look at the data? they can go (log) on the server and watch the games there. live. >Sarah inparticular....you show no proof and call her work >crap. i said that it makes no sense because of the time control used. in such a blitz game the score goes up and down and up and down and the loser is the program that makes the last blunder (before the time out is). i do not call this measuring playing strength. i call this bean counting. >The simple fact is, you're all talk, and I'm anonymous to idiots like you! no. the simple fact is that i do not show my data to anons. i don't know WHO you are and WHY you are. why should i tell you my data ? if you get a phone call at home, don't you ask the other side on the telephone: who are you ?! and do you answer his questions or do you PROVE stuff for him only because he gave you a phone call but WITHOUT TELLING who he is ? Would you invite him to your birthday ?? I prefer talking with people i WANT to talk. and i don't want to talk with anons. talking with anons is wasting time. >P.S. >I ran a match against H9 with S8 and S8 beat your settings HANDS DOWN...you'll >just have to take my *Word* for it. why shall i take the words of an anon ? anons are like spam-emails. you delete them BEFORE you read them. >P.S. > >I've known you for years on the net, and know that you're not someone people can >have a logical conversation with. :-))) and i don't know you for years and believe me, sometimes it is better not to know somebody :-)) >Indeed it takes two to communicate, you can't! right . it takes two. but anons are no people and have no vote :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.