Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Shredder 8 vs Hiarcs 9 30 games..enjoy

Author: Chesster Fritz

Date: 12:37:33 01/27/04

Go up one level in this thread


On January 27, 2004 at 14:53:44, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>On January 27, 2004 at 08:04:07, Chesster Fritz wrote:
>
>>How about for everyone else, Like Sarah Bird and anyone else that might like to
>>look at the data?
>
>they can go (log) on the server and watch the games there. live.
>
>
>>Sarah inparticular....you show no proof and call her work
>>crap.
>
>i said that it makes no sense because of the time control used.
>in such a blitz game the score goes up and down and up and down and the
>loser is the program that makes the last blunder (before the time out is).
>
>i do not call this measuring playing strength. i call this bean counting.
>
>
>>The simple fact is, you're all talk, and I'm anonymous to idiots like  you!
>
>no. the simple fact is that i do not show my data to anons.
>i don't know WHO you are and WHY you are. why should i tell you my data ?
>if you get a phone call at home, don't you ask the other side on the telephone:
>who are you ?!
>
>and do you answer his questions or do you PROVE stuff for him only because he
>gave you a phone call but WITHOUT TELLING who he is ? Would you invite him to
>your birthday ??
>
>I prefer talking with people i WANT to talk. and i don't want to talk with
>anons.
>
>talking with anons is wasting time.
>
>
>>P.S.
>
>>I ran a match against H9 with S8 and S8 beat your settings HANDS DOWN...you'll
>>just have to take my *Word* for it.
>
>why shall i take the words of an anon ?
>anons are like spam-emails. you delete them BEFORE you read them.
>
>
>>P.S.
>>
>>I've known you for years on the net, and know that you're not someone people can
>>have a logical conversation with.
>
>:-)))
>
>and i don't know you for years and believe me, sometimes it is better not to
>know somebody :-))
>
>
>
>>Indeed it takes two to communicate, you can't!
>
>right . it takes two. but anons are no people and have no vote :-)

You have said absolutely nothing intelligent, you're just an arrogant shmuck.

BTW I've been looking at data, mine and others, and S8 is stronger than H9.
I think H9 is one of the best engines, and I have no complaints, but S8 is
stronger, and it makes no difference to me what you think.

However, you're wrong about Sarah and her work, you owe her an apology.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.