Author: Thomas Mayer
Date: 13:30:44 01/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Thorsten, >>However, you're wrong about Sarah and her work, you owe her an apology. > 3' blitz games, even on today hardware makes no sense. > the programs play very louse when they come into time trouble. > all the 20-30 moves or more they played before are irrelevant in the last 1 > minute of the blitz game. they give away pawns, pieces, mates, draws and and > and. You know that this is wrong... playing with no increment makes sometimes sense and it tests time usage of the engine. It's just another way to test things. Period. And you should apology for claiming Sarah not to show all her results. But I know, you will never do... > i prefer time controls where the programs have a certain search depth an the > blunder moves reduce to a certain degree that the data is worth watching. aha, so 3+2 fullfill this ??? LOL... Greets, Thomas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.