Author: Chesster Fritz
Date: 13:52:44 01/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2004 at 16:23:59, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On January 27, 2004 at 15:37:33, Chesster Fritz wrote: >>You have said absolutely nothing intelligent, you're just an arrogant shmuck. > >:-)) when somebody calls me on the telephone and is not telling me his name, i >don't talk to him. what do you do ? waste your time with somebody you don't know >? Why ? > >>BTW I've been looking at data, mine and others, and S8 is stronger than H9. > >:-))) > >of course. if you let hiarcs9 run in default. I said I used your settings, pay attention! Agressive Hypermodern. > > >>I think H9 is one of the best engines, and I have no complaints, but S8 is >>stronger, and it makes no difference to me what you think. > >exactly. >now you understand me. > Unfortunately, yes, all too well. > >>However, you're wrong about Sarah and her work, you owe her an apology. > >3' blitz games, even on today hardware makes no sense. >the programs play very louse when they come into time trouble. >all the 20-30 moves or more they played before are irrelevant in the last 1 >minute of the blitz game. they give away pawns, pieces, mates, draws and and >and. > >if this is the chess you like, chess more like a game where you can have luck >and you win, than use these time controls. i prefer time controls where the >programs have a certain search depth an the blunder moves reduce to a certain >degree that the data is worth watching. > >but you can prefer your data of course. >if you like those games where the last blunder is a function of the few seconds >computation ? You don't know what you're talking about, as usual....Sarah doesn't just do 3/0 games, she uses a varity of time controls. You also don't know what time controls I like. However, reading the vast majority of your posts, you're very bias, when it comes to chess engines. You rave about your settings for Rebel 12, and HIARCS you devote a webpage to. Ahh...I musn't forget CSTAL:o) BTW all good programs, albiet CSTAL is stagnate, as Chris Whittington, gave up on his work some time ago. I could go on but I'm just a stranger on the other end of the receiver, an anon as you say......
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.