Author: Charles Roberson
Date: 07:30:29 01/28/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2004 at 10:11:54, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On January 28, 2004 at 06:02:21, José Carlos wrote: > >I would propose the following: > >1. Olithink plays. I don't see a problem with a last-minute addition, >particularly if it eliminates the "bye" issue. > >2. We _always_ have a "provisional entry" (gnuchessx or tscp or something) "on >call" so that if someone has to drop out at the last minute, we don't end up >with an odd number of players and the bye problem again. If possible the replacement (#2) should be of the similar strength. Why not have the replacement be the most recent public version of the program that dropped out? However, this still requires a replacement operator. Do we always have one?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.