Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Proposal for CCT7

Author: Frank Phillips

Date: 07:41:54 01/28/04

Go up one level in this thread


On January 28, 2004 at 10:11:54, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On January 28, 2004 at 06:02:21, José Carlos wrote:
>
>>  I agree with most that odd number of participants sucks, and that in case of
>>odd number we should allow Olithink to participate this time. But if someone
>>else complains he/she would have exactly the same right as Oliver to enter the
>>tournament after the deadline.
>>  So for CCT7 I suggest to have a reserve engine decided _before_ the deadline
>>comes. Gnuchess is an option but, in principle, any not so strong engine
>>qualifies. There could be, for instance, in the register form an option to vote
>>for a reserve engine among a list of logical candidates (GNU, TSCP, Gerbil,
>>...).
>>
>>  José C.
>
>
>I would propose the following:
>
>1.  Olithink plays.  I don't see a problem with a last-minute addition,
>particularly if it eliminates the "bye" issue.
>
>2.  We _always_ have a "provisional entry" (gnuchessx or tscp or something) "on
>call" so that if someone has to drop out at the last minute, we don't end up
>with an odd number of players and the bye problem again.

With your four way opteron you could play the non-paired entrant simultaneously
 :-)

Frank



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.