Author: enrico carrisco
Date: 10:41:20 01/28/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2004 at 13:11:47, Matthew Hull wrote: >On January 28, 2004 at 13:00:59, Benny Antonsson wrote: > >>On January 28, 2004 at 10:30:39, Matthew Hull wrote: >> >>>On January 28, 2004 at 10:11:54, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On January 28, 2004 at 06:02:21, José Carlos wrote: >>>> >>>>> I agree with most that odd number of participants sucks, and that in case of >>>>>odd number we should allow Olithink to participate this time. But if someone >>>>>else complains he/she would have exactly the same right as Oliver to enter the >>>>>tournament after the deadline. >>>>> So for CCT7 I suggest to have a reserve engine decided _before_ the deadline >>>>>comes. Gnuchess is an option but, in principle, any not so strong engine >>>>>qualifies. There could be, for instance, in the register form an option to vote >>>>>for a reserve engine among a list of logical candidates (GNU, TSCP, Gerbil, >>>>>...). >>>>> >>>>> José C. >>>> >>>> >>>>I would propose the following: >>>> >>>>1. Olithink plays. I don't see a problem with a last-minute addition, >>>>particularly if it eliminates the "bye" issue. >>>> >>>>2. We _always_ have a "provisional entry" (gnuchessx or tscp or something) "on >>>>call" so that if someone has to drop out at the last minute, we don't end up >>>>with an odd number of players and the bye problem again. >>> >>> >>>I noticed in one post that the tomato robot can't handle non-same-day tourneys. >>>It seems to me that it is essential to have a robot that could, taking the load >>>off the one poor guy (Volker). This might make such tourneys easier to manage, >>>and thus we might have more of them than just one a year, and just one format. >>>The easier these are to automate, the more it will open up options for >>>competition. There are so many decent engines now, that you could have entire >>>championship cycles with a "zonal" round-robins leading up to a penultimate >>>match, all within a simgle year. >>> >>>The sophistication that this automation would enable would blow away the >>>marginal, archaic, manual, human-error-prone ECCC. >> >>But do we really want more tourneys like this ? I think one of the things about >>CCT is that it is annual. If it was played say once a month it wouldn't be such >>a big deal. > >You're right. Maybe no more than two per year, and every third year, a more >sophisticated championship cycle. > >matt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.