Author: Chessfun
Date: 13:21:55 01/28/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2004 at 14:53:44, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On January 27, 2004 at 08:04:07, Chesster Fritz wrote: > >>How about for everyone else, Like Sarah Bird and anyone else that might like to >>look at the data? > >they can go (log) on the server and watch the games there. live. > > >>Sarah inparticular....you show no proof and call her work >>crap. > >i said that it makes no sense because of the time control used. >in such a blitz game the score goes up and down and up and down and the >loser is the program that makes the last blunder (before the time out is). > >i do not call this measuring playing strength. i call this bean counting. I was away from Monday morning till now, so I'll add one last thought on this thread. You as I've already said could have written that after the first poster posted his scores. Instead you simply complained that were the settings different agg/hyp then Hiarcs would be stronger. All I did was duplicate the original games with your settings. And If you looked at the games, as I'm sure you did you would know if there were any blunders caused by the time control that having an inc 2 would have fixed. And lastly, whether you count 3/0 beans or 3/2 beans they're all beans. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.