Author: Chessfun
Date: 14:30:57 01/28/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2004 at 17:24:21, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On January 28, 2004 at 16:15:43, Chessfun wrote: > >>Where are these 30 games?. > >which games ? the playchess.com games ? >i don't know how much games these were. > >>These games which ended up in a tie are not the settings you claimed made Hiarcs >>better than Shredder 8. Why didn't you play and post the 30 using the settings >>you claimed were better.? > >do you invent now facts ? which 30 games you talk about ?? YOU posted 30 games. >i said that your results are strange and a RESULT of your methods (3 instead of >3+2). Ok let's try this one last time. You stated that Hiarcs9 hyp+agg was better than Shredder 8 at blitz. I then played 30 games at 3/0 the same as the original poster to whom you made the claim. So why play 50 games with a different set of settings which naturally don't support your argument in any way/shape/form. Where this was left was you were going to play 30 games at 3/2 using Hiarcs 9 agg/hyp v Shredder 8. That was Monday morning, instead first complaining about lack of time or schedule and then second you find time to play 50 games with totally different settings. Or, have you new left that subject completely and decided instead to modify a little bit more and start another subject?. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.