Author: K. Burcham
Date: 19:31:15 01/28/04
[D] 3b4/p3P1q1/P1n2pr1/4p3/2B1n1Pk/1P1R4/P1p3KN/1N6 w - - I was looking over some old test positions. Here is a position I ran on dual machine compared to single. Mate in 15. Big difference in search time and total nodes to find mate. Shredder 7.04 Deep Shredder Paderborn 2210 mhz xp 2x1533 mhz AMD mp 480 kns 600 kns 15/39 14.01 2.55 5.08 84,384,848 186.186.108 Shredder 7.04 14/43 1:45 -6.65-- 1.Rh3+ Kg5 2.Rh5+ Kf4 3.Rf5+ Ke3 4.Rf3+ Kd4 5.Rd3+ Kc5 6.Rd5+ Kb6 7.Rb5+ Kc7 8.Rb7+ Kd6 9.e8N+ Kc5 10.Rb5+ Kd4 11.Rd5+ Ke3 12.Rd3+ (51.368.860) 485.2 14/44 2:39 -7.15-- 1.Rh3+ Kg5 2.Rh5+ Kf4 3.Rf5+ Ke3 4.Rf3+ Kd4 5.Rd3+ Kc5 6.Rd5+ Kb6 7.Rb5+ Kc7 8.Rb7+ Kd6 9.e8N+ Kc5 10.Rb5+ Kd4 11.Rd5+ Ke3 12.Rd3+ (76.639.969) 479.7 14/44 2:39 +0.11 1.Rh3+ Kg5 2.Rh5+ Kf4 3.Rf5+ Ke3 4.Rf3+ Kd4 5.Rd3+ Kc5 6.Rd5+ Kb6 7.Rb5+ Kxa6 8.Rb8+ Ka5 9.exd8Q+ Nxd8 10.Rb5+ Ka6 11.Rb8+ Ka5 12.Rb5+ Ka6 13.Rb8+ Ka5 14.Rb5+ (76.717.584) 479.7 15/39 2:55 +M15++ 1.Rh3+ Kg5 2.Rh5+ Kf4 3.Rf5+ Ke3 4.Rf3+ Kd4 5.Rd3+ Kc5 6.Rd5+ Kb6 7.Rb5+ Kc7 8.Rb7+ Kd6 9.e8N+ Kc5 10.Rb5+ Kd4 11.Rd5+ Ke3 12.Rd3+ Kf4 13.Rf3+ Kg5 14.Rf5+ (84.384.848) 481.5 Deep Shredder Paderborn 14.01 4:57 +0.09++ 1.Rh3+ Kg5 2.Rh5+ Kf4 3.Rf5+ Ke3 4.Rf3+ Kd4 5.Rd3+ Kc5 6.Rd5+ Kb6 7.Rb5+ Kxa6 8.Rb4+ Ka5 9.Rb5+ Ka6 10.Rb4+ Ka5 11.Rb5+ Ka6 12.Rb4+ (178.985.434) 601.4 14.01 5:08 +M15++ 1.Rh3+ Kg5 2.Rh5+ Kf4 3.Rf5+ Ke3 4.Rf3+ Kd4 5.Rd3+ Kc5 6.Rd5+ Kb6 7.Rb5+ Kc7 8.Rb7+ Kd6 9.e8N+ Kc5 10.Rb5+ Kd4 11.Rd5+ Ke3 12.Rd3+ Kf4 13.Rf3+ Kg5 14.Rf5+ (186.186.108) 602.9 best move: Rd3-h3 time: 8:32.906 min n/s: 597.997 CPU 199.7% nodes: 306.716.420
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.