Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 23:49:47 01/28/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2004 at 20:26:36, Paul Doire wrote:
>On January 28, 2004 at 20:17:02, Thomas Mayer wrote:
>
>>Hi Thorsten,
>>
>>> excuse me, but you are doing 5' blitz on a 450 mhz P3 ??
>>> thats ~ 1' blitz on a 1200 AMD and arround 30" blitz game on my 2400 + AMD.
>>
>>And it is 25' rapid on a P90 ! And 2 hours 30 minutes on a 286-16 MHz... :) Can
>>you maybe start to learn that everybody can test WHAT HE WANT ? When he provides
>>you with the correct data like CPU speed etc. the experiment may even get
>>reproduceable ?
>>I do not like the chosen time control with that hardware either -> anyway I will
>>not refuse him from doing so...
>>
>>You might have your own opinion about which time control is to use etc. -> but
>>this does not mean that YOUR opinion is any better then another opinion... It's
>>simply a matter of taste. So stop to annoy everybody who produces results you do
>>not like or uses time controls you do not like either... Simply stop it ! Thanks
>>!
>>
>>Greets, Thomas
>
>
>Thank you Thomas,
>
>I know my hardware is (antique) it is what I use
>for chess. But the playing field is equal they all play
>on the same field...as you already know.
>Good Luck in IPCCC Paderborn with Quark.
>Thorsten doesn't annoy me anymore....immunity system...
>has had a good response...haha
>
>Paul
Hi Paul
In principle you are right: all engines play on
the same field. And for some people [me too] it
is for comparison purposes interesting to see
such results. Personally, on my oldest PC
P3 650/128, I am playing games at time control
15m+10s, 40'/40 and 90m+30s.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.