Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: ?

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 05:00:42 01/29/04

Go up one level in this thread

On January 29, 2004 at 07:31:22, Uri Blass wrote:


>Nobody asked you to test on blitz level.
>People only criticize you for calling it senseless.

IMO it IS senseless.

>People may be interested both in the results of the program in blitz and in
>longer time control.

Blitz on NORMAL machines. this was on 450.

>You can decide what is interesting for you but not what is interesting for other
>people.

I do not decide for other people.
other people decide for themselves.

>For me both long time control and blitz results are interesting and I want to
>improve my program in all time controls.

the problem is not that this is intersting or uninteresting, the problem is IMO
to conclude from these data.

because the hardware and the time control is not within the normal range.

• Re: ? Thomas Mayer 05:36:41 01/29/04
  • Re: ? Thorsten Czub 06:56:12 01/29/04
    • Re: ? Thomas Mayer 07:46:10 01/29/04
      • Re: ? Thorsten Czub 14:01:36 01/29/04
    • Re: ? Uri Blass 07:37:01 01/29/04
      • Re: ? Thorsten Czub 07:59:58 01/29/04
        • Re: ? Uri Blass 22:49:00 01/29/04
  • Re: ? Rolf Tueschen 05:48:59 01/29/04
    • Re: ? Thorsten Czub 06:58:55 01/29/04
    • Re: ? (german post - off topic) Thomas Mayer 06:47:40 01/29/04
      • Re: ? (german post - off topic) Thorsten Czub 07:52:07 01/29/04
        • Re: ? (german post - off topic) Thomas Mayer 08:17:28 01/29/04
          • Re: ? (german post - off topic) Thorsten Czub 11:36:06 01/29/04
      • Re: ? (german post - off topic) English Answer On Topic Rolf Tueschen 07:25:32 01/29/04

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.