Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 07:25:32 01/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 29, 2004 at 09:47:40, Thomas Mayer wrote: >Hi Rolf, > >>I dont get this. Isn't it always IMO or subjectively what we write here? > >ich antworte mal in Deutsch: klar, eigentlich sollte es so sein -> aber Thorsten >neigt dazu seine Meinung als absolut und einzig richtige darzustellen - hinzu >kommt, daß er stets versucht andere lächerlich zu machen (Autos aus dem Flugzeug >werfen, blablabla), die anderer Meinung sind und dabei schulmeisterlich und auch >noch beleidigend auftritt... Vielleicht mußte ihm das einfach mal gesagt >werden... This is not the point. We _all_ write from a subjective position which is actually the best we can think of and therfore we can't imagine how others could see things different. Caveat: the identity of what we think is ok and what we thinks others could think is 100% if we have less experience. With rising experience we know what differences are possible and we are still all sitting in the same boat. So this is NOT the problem I have with him. Our differences could be mountain-high and I could still enjoy the debate. But all else would be insulting and I won't do that here in this decent forum. Thorsten is ok and has good opinions most of the time but I still decided longer time ago to stop communicating with him. Perhaps this: the higher your experience you know how unimportant certain things are and you win that freedom to play, having fun. Now this is certainly not the interest or talent of everyone. So why telling him certain things. Do you believe he will swallow? Nürnberger Trichter... >Leider sind Deine Meinungsäußerungen zwar eleganter aber prinzipiell >gleichartig einzustufen... If you compare me with TC then you are right, we often have the same opinions, but then we differ in many aspects. I don't want to say that yopu as the reader discover automatically the differences. But it is possible. Psychologically I have the same opinion about ChessBase or CSS people who either dont realise how closely they are related or who intentiously want to throw sand into your eyes so that you might not exactly see what's going on. I dont have T.s bad experiences with ChessBase or CSS but I see what he is talking about. And monopolism is always evil, believe me. Also talents can be good in general but evil in particular details. The naive grasp of Fred's natural instinct is good for his contacts but in detail it can go into humiliating you. Only as long as you profit you dont take notice. It is when you are basically nothing, you see if you are treated with decency. Fred will always prefer the effect for itself. This is an intellectual vice and I have it too. But in case you are the personal victim this is a bit negative. But still. Here TC and I differ. Vicious jokes is not something he can enjoy. :) >Wenn ich jetzt ganz böse wäre könnte ich schreiben >daß ich mir so richtig vorstellen kann wie freudig sabbernd Du vor Deinem PC >sitzt wenn Du endlich mal wieder eine Diskussion gefunden hast bei der Du so >richtig hübsch den Psychologen und guten Menschen raushängen kannst... Blödsinn. But of course it is satisfying to be able to criticise and thus making things better. You also misunderstand old age. <ggg> It's not that you lose spit but fluids much deeper of your body. :)) >aber ich >bin nicht böse, also schreib ich sowas ja auch nicht... :) Dein eigentliches >Experiment ist ja die Diskussion an sich, um die Sache geht es Dir weniger... This is very patronizing, only because I cant program you want to stigmatize me. How about my programming tries of your mind? Do you feel already the changes? Still some bugs? Let me guess: Brutus team? No, never ever would I think of that team. I stay with my money on V. and GC. Just for fun. Rolf > >Schönen Gruß, > >Thomas > >PS: Da das ganze ins off topic abdriftet machen wir hier Schluß - im anderen >Thread übrigens nicht, ich würde wirklich gerne wissen, welche Verfahrensweise >Du denn vorschlagen würdest. Wäre es entsprechend praktikabel könnte man sowas >ja durchaus auch für die Olympischen Spiele anwenden - um häßliche Bilder um >einen Ben Johnson zu verhindern -> weiß irgendwer aus dem Stehgreif den >Sprinter, der dann im nachhinein die Goldmedaille bekam ? Bemerkst Du was ?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.