Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 07:59:58 01/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 29, 2004 at 10:37:01, Uri Blass wrote: >She was talking about the future and not about the past in her post. time is unimportant in the sentence she says. >Why did she ask you to post all games? because she implies that i do NOT post all games. this is an insult. so she has to apologize :-) >Your statement was not a copy of her statement for the following reasons: >1)your statement was about the past when her statement was about the future. ???? this is the same. >There is a difference if you tell somebody not to steal or blame him directly in >stealing. ??? do you still hit you wife ? will you again hit your wife ? there is a difference ?? ah .- come on. >2)It seemed obvious from her post that she posted all games that she had. > >It was less obvious if you are going to post all games because opinion if you >post all games may be dependent on the content of your post. ??? if you post a match between somebody, you post all games. there are no other solutions, only that you want to show something far from measuring the strength. e.g. positional behaviour or bugs. so the asking for all games is completely redundant. you always post all games when posting a match. everything else is cheating. >3 games that hiarcs beated Fritz then it is not obvious if you post all games >that you have. > >Uri right. here you get samples. examples. but a match is a match. it makes not much sense to write X : Y +5 -3 =6 and to post 1 or 2 games. this is only when you give a summary.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.