Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 14:01:36 01/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 29, 2004 at 10:46:10, Thomas Mayer wrote: >Maybe you think NOW about the way you write things... got me ? the way i write things is completely ok. there is nothing wrong critisizing games on 450 mhz p3. its neither insulting nor offending. its an opinion and the word senseless is not offending. and it's not a WORK he has done. he pressed a button, a mouse klick. WORK is something else. e.g. QUARK or Hiarcs or Tiger or whatever is WORK. Du scheinst da ein Problem mit der Verhältnismäßigkeit zu haben. Maybe you read >also Rolfs posting about this... But it seems nothing will open your eyes... >(just to not repeat the sentence again and again... :) > >Greets, Thomas there is nothing to open. a match on a pc is not his masterpiece. it's just a little data generated by a pc. the programs are optimized for todays hardware. no programmer really tests how his today program plays on a 450 mhz P3 (the p3 is slower than an AMD with similar speed) . of course they all believe that the moves will be ok, but the things are different on slower hardware. i know this especially from testing tiger15 on palm M100.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.