Author: Djordje Vidanovic
Date: 19:46:38 01/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 29, 2004 at 19:29:55, Slater Wold wrote: >On January 29, 2004 at 17:26:39, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: > >>On January 29, 2004 at 15:50:15, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>On January 29, 2004 at 15:25:37, Peter Berger wrote: >>> >>>>On January 29, 2004 at 15:02:18, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>Based on past discussions, I don't believe it is a clone. however, if someone >>>>>wants to send me an executable, there are some "binary signatures" that I can >>>>>look for (I just did this for another program that did turn out to be a clone >>>>>even though the author claimed it was original). >>>>> >>>>>There are some things that _nobody_ would do the same way, and too many matching >>>>>bit patterns is a huge clue. :) >>>> >>>>Link to free download of the current version: >>>> >>>>http://www.zipproth.com/chess/List-engine.zip >>>> >>>>Link to free download of an older version: >>>> >>>>http://www.wbec-ridderkerk.nl/html/download/list/list_461.zip >>>> >>>> >>>>So it's probably easiest to download yourself. >>>> >>>>Peter >>> >>>461 will probably be 'clone-like'. The latest probably will not. >>> >>>Do it Bob! And let us know! >> >> >>I am willing to wager a bet that 461 is not a clone, nor clone-like. You were >>saying... >> >>Djordje > >I've seen 461 decompiled... > >You were saying? I was saying that you had been saying that 461 would probably be clone-like and then you were saying that you'd seen it decompiled. So what were you saying, what was the verdict after the decompilation? Djordje
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.