Author: Slater Wold
Date: 21:11:57 01/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 29, 2004 at 22:46:38, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >On January 29, 2004 at 19:29:55, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On January 29, 2004 at 17:26:39, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >> >>>On January 29, 2004 at 15:50:15, Slater Wold wrote: >>> >>>>On January 29, 2004 at 15:25:37, Peter Berger wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 29, 2004 at 15:02:18, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Based on past discussions, I don't believe it is a clone. however, if someone >>>>>>wants to send me an executable, there are some "binary signatures" that I can >>>>>>look for (I just did this for another program that did turn out to be a clone >>>>>>even though the author claimed it was original). >>>>>> >>>>>>There are some things that _nobody_ would do the same way, and too many matching >>>>>>bit patterns is a huge clue. :) >>>>> >>>>>Link to free download of the current version: >>>>> >>>>>http://www.zipproth.com/chess/List-engine.zip >>>>> >>>>>Link to free download of an older version: >>>>> >>>>>http://www.wbec-ridderkerk.nl/html/download/list/list_461.zip >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>So it's probably easiest to download yourself. >>>>> >>>>>Peter >>>> >>>>461 will probably be 'clone-like'. The latest probably will not. >>>> >>>>Do it Bob! And let us know! >>> >>> >>>I am willing to wager a bet that 461 is not a clone, nor clone-like. You were >>>saying... >>> >>>Djordje >> >>I've seen 461 decompiled... >> >>You were saying? > > >I was saying that you had been saying that 461 would probably be clone-like and >then you were saying that you'd seen it decompiled. So what were you saying, >what was the verdict after the decompilation? > >Djordje Crafty isn't my project, and I am no Crafty expert, but the result was *very* similar to a Crafty. Bob is the only one who can say for sure. I can't wait for him to do so.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.