Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:54:04 01/30/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 30, 2004 at 10:04:06, Anthony Cozzie wrote:
>On January 30, 2004 at 09:47:34, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On January 30, 2004 at 09:04:27, Anthony Cozzie wrote:
>>
>>>On January 30, 2004 at 02:14:05, Nolan Denson wrote:
>>>
>>>>Guys i need to let you all know there is a new King on the horizon. I have
>>>>never seen a program play so well. I was playing on ICC with a version of
>>>>Pepito .. Its was basically beating almost all the programs it faced until i
>>>>played against a program called SlowChess. This program easily beat Pepito 3
>>>>games in a row. But you may be saying to yourself but Pepito isn't very strong
>>>>... well up until that point it was beating a few of the commercial programs ...
>>>>so i decided .. to go get this slowchess program .. i loaded it up and Wow .. it
>>>>is super super strong. SlowChess is being played by Deuteronomy
>>>>
>>>>Check out the Game Below .. you will see the power of this Program. I have never
>>>>seen a program play so well.
>>>>
>>>>Dhaka (2666) vs. DEUTERONOMY (2622) --- 2004.01.30 01:49:30
>>>>Rated Blitz match, initial time: 5 minutes, increment: 5 seconds
>>>>
>>>> 1. e4 (0:00) e5 (0:00)
>>>> 2. Nc3 (0:00) Nf6 (0:00)
>>>> 3. Nf3 (0:00) Nc6 (0:00)
>>>> 4. d4 (0:00) exd4 (0:00)
>>>> 5. Nd5 (0:00) Nxe4 (0:13)
>>>> 6. Bc4 (0:00) Bb4+ (0:13)
>>>> 7. c3 (0:00) dxc3 (0:13)
>>>> 8. O-O (0:00) O-O (0:13)
>>>> 9. Qb3 (0:00) cxb2 (0:09)
>>>> 10. Bxb2 (0:00) Ba5 (0:13)
>>>> 11. Qc2 (0:00) Nc5 (0:13)
>>>> 12. Nf4 (0:42) d6 (0:00)
>>>> 13. h4 (0:31) Ne7 (0:00)
>>>> 14. Nh5 (0:13) Bf5 (0:00)
>>>> 15. Qc1 (0:21) b5 (0:12)
>>>> 16. Bxg7 (0:06) bxc4 (0:06)
>>>> 17. Qh6 (0:05) f6 (0:07)
>>>> 18. Nxf6+ (0:11) Rxf6 (0:01)
>>>> 19. Bxf6 (0:15) Ne6 (0:00)
>>>> 20. g4 (0:16) Bd3 (0:00)
>>>> 21. Ng5 (0:48) Qf8 (0:00)
>>>> 22. Qxf8+ (0:14) Nxf8 (0:00)
>>>> 23. Bxe7 (0:09) Ng6 (0:04)
>>>> 24. Bf6 (0:10) Rf8 (0:04)
>>>> 25. Bb2 (0:05) c3 (0:10)
>>>> 26. Ba3 (0:04) Bxf1 (0:14)
>>>> 27. Rxf1 (0:00) Rf4 (0:14)
>>>> 28. f3 (0:14) Ra4 (0:00)
>>>> 29. Bc1 (0:10) Rxa2 (0:05)
>>>> 30. Ne4 (0:08) Nxh4 (0:12)
>>>> 31. Bg5 (0:02) Ng6 (0:08)
>>>> 32. Kh1 (0:02) c2 (0:07)
>>>> 33. Ng3 (0:08) Ne5 (0:10)
>>>> 34. Ne2 (0:04) d5 (0:06)
>>>> 35. Bf6 (0:21) Nd3 (0:09)
>>>> 36. Bg5 (0:43) Rb2 (0:00)
>>>> 37. Nd4 (0:10) Bb6 (0:10)
>>>> 38. Ne2 (0:01) Nf2+ (0:09)
>>>> 39. Kg2 (0:02) c1=N (0:10)
>>>> 40. Rxc1 (0:12) Rxe2 (0:10)
>>>> 41. Kf1 (0:01) Rb2 (0:09)
>>>> 42. Re1 (0:07) h5 (0:03)
>>>> 43. Re8+ (0:06) Kf7 (0:04)
>>>> 44. Re7+ (0:05) Kg6 (0:05)
>>>> 45. Bf4 (0:09) hxg4 (0:11)
>>>> 46. fxg4 (0:07) d4 (0:03)
>>>> 47. Re6+ (0:27) Kf7 (0:00)
>>>> 48. Re2 (0:06) Rxe2 (0:05)
>>>> 49. Kxe2 (0:32) Nxg4 (0:00)
>>>> 50. Bd2 (0:07) c5 (0:11)
>>>> 51. Kd3 (0:00) Ke6 (0:11)
>>>> 52. Be1 (0:25)
>>>> {White resigns} 0-1
>>>>Statistics for SlowChess2(C) On for: 2:07 Idle: 10
>>>>
>>>> rating [need] win loss draw total best
>>>>Bullet 2584 498 78 58 634 2711 (24-Jan-2004)
>>>>Blitz 2719 734 164 114 1012 2832 (11-Jan-2004)
>>>>Standard 2536 560 208 149 917 2576 (13-Jan-2004)
>>>>
>>>> 1: Hardware: Athlon 64 FX 96 MB Hash
>>>> 2: Software: SlowChess v2.89b
>>>> 3:
>>>> 4: CPU is also used to run other programs at the same time.
>>>> 5: http://www.3dkingdoms.com/chess/slow.htm
>>>> 6: Every once in a while accepts or offers draws in the endgame.
>>>> 7: I'd like to thank titled players for playing SlowChess.
>>>>
>>>> Email : ogre@3dkingdoms.com
>>>
>>>I've also noticed that Slowchess is pretty strong.
>>>
>>>Slowchess is what you get when you combine large spatial control terms, pretty
>>>good kingsafety, and lot of extensions. Sort of like Chessmaster, I think.
>>>
>>>anthony
>>
>>As far as I know slowchess is a fast searcher.
>>The name is only that it was originally slow.
>>
>>It is not something like chessmaster.
>>
>>Uri
>
>Does Chessmaster have large spatial control terms? Yes.
>Does Chessmaster have good kingsafety? Yes.
>Does Chessmaster have a lot of extensions? Yes.
>
>I don't think I mentioned nps.
>
>anthony
I do not claim to know what chessmaster has or what slowchess has.
I only think that comparing slowchess with chessmaster is wrong when chessmaster
is significantly better.
Uri
Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.