Author: Rex
Date: 12:00:00 01/30/04
Go up one level in this thread
I believe in his tourney YES S8 won convincingly and YES S8 can be call the better program and strongest program in his tourney that he set up, in which both sides had equal rules and time. I too am tired of people saying "not enough games." Hey if you set up a tourney and there is a winner, than that person has the right to post the winner as the_best_proram and the winner for that particular tourney PERIOD with a dot. On January 30, 2004 at 13:21:11, Christophe Theron wrote: >On January 30, 2004 at 12:16:09, George Sobala wrote: > >>20 games at 30 minutes per game >>Played under CB GUI, no ponder >>Two comps used, P4-1800 and AMD-1700+, >>ten games played on each machine. >>32M hash >>5moves.ctg opening book (normal, no learning) >>3+4 man EGTBs >> >>Shredder 8 (default) v ChessTiger 15 (gambit) [aka Gambit Tiger III] >> >>Shredder 8 won convincingly: +10 -4 =6 > > > >CONVINCINGLY? > >So it does not matter how many times we explain when a match result is >significant and when it is not. > >This discussion has happened over and over again here. Last time was two or >three days ago. > >And just after explaining the whole stuff once again, you come here and pretend >that 13-7 is a convincing result? > >I'm now CONVINCED that people never learn. > > > > Christophe > > > > >> >>gt30b MyTown 2004 >> >> 12345678901234567890 >>1 Shredder 8 00½1½111½1½10½1011½1 13/20 >>2 Chess Tiger 15.0 11½0½000½0½01½0100½0 7/20
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.