Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 15:38:03 01/30/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 30, 2004 at 13:25:17, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>On January 30, 2004 at 13:21:11, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On January 30, 2004 at 12:16:09, George Sobala wrote:
>>
>>>20 games at 30 minutes per game
>>>Played under CB GUI, no ponder
>>>Two comps used, P4-1800 and AMD-1700+,
>>>ten games played on each machine.
>>>32M hash
>>>5moves.ctg opening book (normal, no learning)
>>>3+4 man EGTBs
>>>
>>>Shredder 8 (default) v ChessTiger 15 (gambit) [aka Gambit Tiger III]
>>>
>>>Shredder 8 won convincingly: +10 -4 =6
>>
>>
>>
>>CONVINCINGLY?
>>
>>So it does not matter how many times we explain when a match result is
>>significant and when it is not.
>>
>>This discussion has happened over and over again here. Last time was two or
>>three days ago.
>>
>>And just after explaining the whole stuff once again, you come here and pretend
>>that 13-7 is a convincing result?
>>
>>I'm now CONVINCED that people never learn.
>>
>>
>>
>> Christophe
>
>Well????
>
>It _was_ convincing to you. :)
Yes, there was something convincing in his post, but not what he intended. :)
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.