Author: Larry Scott
Date: 22:54:49 01/30/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 30, 2004 at 14:27:25, m.d.hurd wrote: >On January 30, 2004 at 13:21:11, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>On January 30, 2004 at 12:16:09, George Sobala wrote: >> >>>20 games at 30 minutes per game >>>Played under CB GUI, no ponder >>>Two comps used, P4-1800 and AMD-1700+, >>>ten games played on each machine. >>>32M hash >>>5moves.ctg opening book (normal, no learning) >>>3+4 man EGTBs >>> >>>Shredder 8 (default) v ChessTiger 15 (gambit) [aka Gambit Tiger III] >>> >>>Shredder 8 won convincingly: +10 -4 =6 >> >> >> >>CONVINCINGLY? >> >>So it does not matter how many times we explain when a match result is >>significant and when it is not. >> >>This discussion has happened over and over again here. Last time was two or >>three days ago. >> >>And just after explaining the whole stuff once again, you come here and pretend >>that 13-7 is a convincing result? >> >>I'm now CONVINCED that people never learn. >> >> >> >> Christophe >> >> >> >> >>> >>>gt30b MyTown 2004 >>> >>> 12345678901234567890 >>>1 Shredder 8 00½1½111½1½10½1011½1 13/20 >>>2 Chess Tiger 15.0 11½0½000½0½01½0100½0 7/20 > > >I am 83% convinced that shredder 8 is better :-) > >Hows that :-) I can do even better,I am convinced that shredder is 100% better >
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.