Author: F. Huber
Date: 01:14:42 01/31/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 30, 2004 at 19:58:38, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 30, 2004 at 17:51:10, F. Huber wrote: > >>[D] 1R6/6pK/5p2/4p3/1B1p3n/8/p1p1pp2/1k3b2 w - - 0 1 >> >> >>ChestUCI Ver.3.2 UCI: >> >>CPU: Celeron 400MHz >>FEN: 1R6/6pK/5p2/4p3/1B1p3n/8/p1p1pp2/1k3b2 w - - >>Search for Special-Mate [C0/K1/X14] in 38 ... (Hash=64MB) >>38 00:01 M38 Ba3+ >>Search completed ... (Time=1.53s) >>Special-Mate in 38 found ! (00:01) >>1. Ba3+ Ka1 Bb2+ Kb1 Bxd4+ Kc1 Be3+ Kd1 Rd8+ Ke1 Bd2+ Kd1 Bb4+ Kc1 Ba3+ Kb1 >>Rb8+ Ka1 Bb2+ Kb1 Bxe5+ Kc1 Bf4+ Kd1 Rd8+ Ke1 Bd2+ Kd1 Bb4+ Kc1 Ba3+ Kb1 Rb8+ >>Ka1 Bb2+ Kb1 Bxf6+ Kc1 Bg5+ Kd1 Rd8+ Ke1 Bd2+ Kd1 Bb4+ Kc1 Ba3+ Kb1 Rb8+ Ka1 >>Bb2+ Kb1 Bxg7+ Kc1 Bh6+ Kd1 Rd8+ Ke1 Bd2+ Kd1 Bb4+ Kc1 Ba3+ Kb1 Rb8+ Ka1 Be7 >>c1=B Bf6+ Bb2 Rxb2 Nf3 Rb3+ Nd4 Bxd4# >> >>Can anyone beat this? ;-) >> >>And before you ask: >>1) NO - this is absolutely no fake! >>2) YES - this is already the ´next generation´ of ChestUCI, >>which will be available in a few days. :) >> >>Regards, >>Franz. > >I understand that chest did not prove that it is the shortest mate so your post >is misleading. > >chest is known as something that can prove the shortest mate so when you say >mate in 38 in one second the first thought is also about proving no mate in 37. > >Uri Do I understand you right? You prefer a Chest, which is _not_ able to solve such a deep mate at all (of course this is impossible with brute-force!), instead of a Chest with an _additional_ mate solving mode, which _can_ find such solutions (although it´s not guaranteed to be the shortest one)? If this is the common opinion here, I see absolutely no reason to make this new Chest version (with my enhancements) available to the public! :-( Franz.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.