Author: Matthias Gemuh
Date: 03:30:26 01/31/04
Go up one level in this thread
>> >>chest is known as something that can prove the shortest mate so when you say >>mate in 38 in one second the first thought is also about proving no mate in 37. >> >>Uri > >Do I understand you right? >You prefer a Chest, which is _not_ able to solve such a deep mate at all >(of course this is impossible with brute-force!), instead of a Chest with >an _additional_ mate solving mode, which _can_ find such solutions >(although it´s not guaranteed to be the shortest one)? > >If this is the common opinion here, I see absolutely no reason to make >this new Chest version (with my enhancements) available to the public! :-( > >Franz. I think you have chosen to misunderstand Uri. I understand him as follows: If a mate in 38 is found in 1 second, how long does it take to do that which Chest is known for (i.e. find shortest mate or confirm that current mate is shortest) ?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.