Author: F. Huber
Date: 03:36:15 01/31/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 31, 2004 at 04:50:59, Michael Diosi wrote: >On January 31, 2004 at 04:14:42, F. Huber wrote: ... >>Do I understand you right? >>You prefer a Chest, which is _not_ able to solve such a deep mate at all >>(of course this is impossible with brute-force!), instead of a Chest with >>an _additional_ mate solving mode, which _can_ find such solutions >>(although it´s not guaranteed to be the shortest one)? >> >>If this is the common opinion here, I see absolutely no reason to make >>this new Chest version (with my enhancements) available to the public! :-( >> >>Franz. > >Hi Franz, > >you know what we are looking for, don't you ? I think you are doing a nice piece >of work, and I do like programs that solve such chess puzzles. > >Michael Hello Michael, yes I know, that there are at least a _few_ fans (like you ;-)). And so probably there _will_ be new Chest version available soon. :-) Best regards, Franz.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.