Author: F. Huber
Date: 03:38:43 01/31/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 31, 2004 at 06:30:26, Matthias Gemuh wrote: >>> >>>chest is known as something that can prove the shortest mate so when you say >>>mate in 38 in one second the first thought is also about proving no mate in 37. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Do I understand you right? >>You prefer a Chest, which is _not_ able to solve such a deep mate at all >>(of course this is impossible with brute-force!), instead of a Chest with >>an _additional_ mate solving mode, which _can_ find such solutions >>(although it´s not guaranteed to be the shortest one)? >> >>If this is the common opinion here, I see absolutely no reason to make >>this new Chest version (with my enhancements) available to the public! :-( >> >>Franz. > > > > >I think you have chosen to misunderstand Uri. >I understand him as follows: >If a mate in 38 is found in 1 second, how long does it take to do that >which Chest is known for (i.e. find shortest mate or confirm that current mate >is shortest) ? I would guess: days! (or months, years ... - I´m probably too old to try it ;-)) Franz.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.