Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 10:17:13 01/31/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 31, 2004 at 11:45:38, David Dahlem wrote: >On January 31, 2004 at 09:49:59, Thao Tak-Sen wrote: > >>On January 31, 2004 at 08:43:37, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>Some minutes before the opening of this year's biggest tournament I want to ask >>>you for your statements. If you can give your opinion about the three first >>>incoming programs. Just like I do it here: >>> >>> >>>1. JUNIOR >>> >>>2. CRAFTY >>> >>>3. ? >>> >>> >>>Rolf >> >>1.Hiarcs >>2.Rebel >>3.Ruffian >>4.Junior >>5.crafty >>6.Yace >>7.Quark >>8.Falcon >>9.GLC >>10.Pepito > >In a 9 round swiss with 54 entries, are not only the first four and last four >finishers determined to be accurate? Or do i stand corrected? > >Regards >Dave Define "accurate". you need 6 rounds for a good 1st place, 9 rounds should get a pretty accurate view of the first 16 places, but "accurate" is a overused word in a Swiss of course...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.