Author: David Dahlem
Date: 10:41:39 01/31/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 31, 2004 at 13:17:13, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On January 31, 2004 at 11:45:38, David Dahlem wrote: > >>On January 31, 2004 at 09:49:59, Thao Tak-Sen wrote: >> >>>On January 31, 2004 at 08:43:37, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>> >>>>Some minutes before the opening of this year's biggest tournament I want to ask >>>>you for your statements. If you can give your opinion about the three first >>>>incoming programs. Just like I do it here: >>>> >>>> >>>>1. JUNIOR >>>> >>>>2. CRAFTY >>>> >>>>3. ? >>>> >>>> >>>>Rolf >>> >>>1.Hiarcs >>>2.Rebel >>>3.Ruffian >>>4.Junior >>>5.crafty >>>6.Yace >>>7.Quark >>>8.Falcon >>>9.GLC >>>10.Pepito >> >>In a 9 round swiss with 54 entries, are not only the first four and last four >>finishers determined to be accurate? Or do i stand corrected? >> >>Regards >>Dave > >Define "accurate". you need 6 rounds for a good 1st place, 9 rounds should get >a pretty accurate view of the first 16 places, but "accurate" is a overused word >in a Swiss of course... Hi Bob I'm using "accurate" the same way you use "you need 6 rounds for a good 1st place". Or in other words, 9 rounds for a good 4 top finishers. Regards Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.