Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Ruffian Leiden v Crafty 19.09

Author: Drexel,Michael

Date: 00:25:46 02/01/04

Go up one level in this thread


On January 31, 2004 at 19:03:57, Roger Brown wrote:

>>Own Books?
>>Hashtables?
>>TBs?
>
>
>
>Each engine used its own book.  Ruffian Leiden used the Leiden book and Crafty
>the book that has been available for years on Professor Hyatt's site.  I think I
>may change that soon because Dann Corbit compiled a narrow tournament book and
>the latest Crafty site has a newer and better (?) book.  I mean, Professor Hyatt
>just had Crafty eat some pgn and spit out a book for goodness sake.  Surely
>Crafty deserves a crafted book... (that was just awful).
>
>
>Hash was 50 Mb each (or as near as I could get considering that Crafty goes up
>in steps so hash was 48 Mb).
>
>
>All 4 man egtbs.
>

Thanks

>
>Your view that this result is not a good one for Crafty misses the point of what
>this post was about.  I was not trying to eastablish any other point but this:
>
>Crafty is *not* mincemeat for Ruffian.

I have posted the result of a Crafty 19.06-Hiarcs 9 Blitz match some time ago.
250 games 5+3 on AMD 1.8Ghz. Crafty scored about 36%.

According to the various rating lists Ruffian 2 is clearly weaker than Hiarcs 9
in Blitz.

The context of that remark is to be
>found in postings some time ago which suggested that in a match between Crafty
>and this version of Ruffian that Crafty would be crushed.

Certainly not

Michael

>
>My *very* limited match on my slow, outdated but beloved piece of hardware seems
>to indicate that caution is indicated before making such an assertion.
>
>I just wanted to save some people some money because Professor Hyatt was looking
>for some easy cash and he wanted some takers for that bet......
>
>:-)
>
>Thanks for reading the post.
>
>
>Later.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.