Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 07:44:16 02/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2004 at 09:08:50, Chessfun wrote: >On February 01, 2004 at 05:06:34, George Tsavdaris wrote: > >>On January 31, 2004 at 23:48:06, Chessfun wrote: >> >>> >>>All Ruffian Leiden games with Leiden book at 30'/40+30'/40+15' >>>AMD XP 2600+ >>>All native books where possible, general.ctg where not. >>> >>>Top 20. >>> >>>Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws >>> >>> 1 Deep Fritz 8 : 2683 47 42 160 61.3 % 2603 37.5 % >>> 2 Hiarcs 9 : 2646 47 39 180 56.9 % 2598 36.1 % >>> 3 Fritz 8 : 2637 29 23 450 56.4 % 2592 38.7 % >>> 4 Deep Fritz 7 : 2635 32 26 374 56.3 % 2591 36.6 % >>> 5 Deep Junior 8 : 2632 43 39 210 57.1 % 2583 28.6 % >>> 6 Shredder 7 : 2631 37 31 290 55.3 % 2594 32.8 % >>> 7 Tiger 15 normal : 2631 33 24 377 54.9 % 2597 42.4 % >>> 8 Tiger 15 gam agr : 2629 48 44 163 58.0 % 2573 31.3 % >>> 9 Junior 8 : 2628 46 37 190 55.5 % 2589 36.3 % >>> 10 Shredder 7.04 : 2619 37 29 310 54.7 % 2586 34.5 % >>> 11 Shredder Paderbo : 2615 40 31 262 54.0 % 2587 34.7 % >>> 12 Fritz 7 : 2613 22 19 732 58.1 % 2556 38.7 % >>> 13 Chess Tiger 14.0 : 2606 22 16 842 56.2 % 2563 43.2 % >>> 14 Ruffian 2.0.0 : 2604 39 59 140 49.6 % 2607 40.7 % >>> 15 Gambit Tiger 2.0 : 2604 21 16 878 57.3 % 2553 41.8 % >>> 16 Fritz 7 (No MMX) : 2602 49 36 162 58.0 % 2546 44.4 % >>> 17 Deep Fritz : 2591 26 20 605 54.1 % 2562 36.9 % >>> 18 Ruffian 1.0.1 : 2587 46 32 220 51.4 % 2577 38.2 % >>> 19 Ruffian Leiden2003 : 2583 38 54 160 48.4 % 2594 38.1 % >>> 20 List 504 : 2580 28 45 230 48.9 % 2587 46.5 % >>> >> >>Did Ruffian Leiden play with general.ctg? > >>>All Ruffian Leiden games with Leiden book at 30'/40+30'/40+15' > >> Ruffian Leiden has comparable performance with Ruffian 1.01? I have analysed >>with those two engines some games and i've seen that Ruffian Leiden is MUCH >>better than Ruffian 1.01. So the result of it must be unlucky if there is such a >>word for chess. I hope in the next games it's performance to be improved. >> As i'm too lazy to look at your previous posts to see how Ruffian 1.01 >>performed against all other programs, can you post it's statistics here please? > >(18) Ruffian 1.0.1 : 220 (+ 71,= 84,- 65), 51.4 % > >Hiarcs 7.32 : 10 (+ 4,= 3,- 3), 55.0 % >Chess Tiger 14.0 : 10 (+ 3,= 2,- 5), 40.0 % >Gambit Tiger 2.0 : 10 (+ 4,= 2,- 4), 50.0 % >Goliath Light 1.5 : 10 (+ 8,= 1,- 1), 85.0 % >Deep Junior 7 : 10 (+ 3,= 2,- 5), 40.0 % >Fritz 7 : 10 (+ 6,= 1,- 3), 65.0 % >Gandalf 5.1 : 10 (+ 3,= 4,- 3), 50.0 % >Shredder 6 : 10 (+ 3,= 3,- 4), 45.0 % >Tiger 15 normal style : 10 (+ 1,= 4,- 5), 30.0 % >Hiarcs 8 : 10 (+ 5,= 3,- 2), 65.0 % >Shredder Paderborn : 20 (+ 5,= 8,- 7), 45.0 % >Crafty 18.15 : 10 (+ 4,= 5,- 1), 65.0 % >Deep Fritz 7 : 10 (+ 0,= 5,- 5), 25.0 % >Chessmaster 9000 : 20 (+ 6,= 8,- 6), 50.0 % >Tiger 15 gambit agressive : 10 (+ 2,= 3,- 5), 35.0 % >Fritz 8 : 20 (+ 4,= 14,- 2), 55.0 % >Deep Sjeng 1.0 : 10 (+ 7,= 3,- 0), 85.0 % >List 504 : 10 (+ 2,= 6,- 2), 50.0 % >Hiarcs 9 : 10 (+ 1,= 7,- 2), 45.0 % > > >Sarah. Hi, bad results vs. Chess Tiger but with more time Ruffian killed ChessTiger 14, 15. Chess Tiger is a strong program for fast games but a good program must be played with every time controls strong (the words by Christophe Theron). Unfortunatly, Ruffian is in Blitz not very strong ... Best Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.