Author: Chessfun
Date: 08:55:40 02/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2004 at 10:44:16, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >On February 01, 2004 at 09:08:50, Chessfun wrote: > >>On February 01, 2004 at 05:06:34, George Tsavdaris wrote: >> >>>On January 31, 2004 at 23:48:06, Chessfun wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>All Ruffian Leiden games with Leiden book at 30'/40+30'/40+15' >>>>AMD XP 2600+ >>>>All native books where possible, general.ctg where not. >>>> >>>>Top 20. >>>> >>>>Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws >>>> >>>> 1 Deep Fritz 8 : 2683 47 42 160 61.3 % 2603 37.5 % >>>> 2 Hiarcs 9 : 2646 47 39 180 56.9 % 2598 36.1 % >>>> 3 Fritz 8 : 2637 29 23 450 56.4 % 2592 38.7 % >>>> 4 Deep Fritz 7 : 2635 32 26 374 56.3 % 2591 36.6 % >>>> 5 Deep Junior 8 : 2632 43 39 210 57.1 % 2583 28.6 % >>>> 6 Shredder 7 : 2631 37 31 290 55.3 % 2594 32.8 % >>>> 7 Tiger 15 normal : 2631 33 24 377 54.9 % 2597 42.4 % >>>> 8 Tiger 15 gam agr : 2629 48 44 163 58.0 % 2573 31.3 % >>>> 9 Junior 8 : 2628 46 37 190 55.5 % 2589 36.3 % >>>> 10 Shredder 7.04 : 2619 37 29 310 54.7 % 2586 34.5 % >>>> 11 Shredder Paderbo : 2615 40 31 262 54.0 % 2587 34.7 % >>>> 12 Fritz 7 : 2613 22 19 732 58.1 % 2556 38.7 % >>>> 13 Chess Tiger 14.0 : 2606 22 16 842 56.2 % 2563 43.2 % >>>> 14 Ruffian 2.0.0 : 2604 39 59 140 49.6 % 2607 40.7 % >>>> 15 Gambit Tiger 2.0 : 2604 21 16 878 57.3 % 2553 41.8 % >>>> 16 Fritz 7 (No MMX) : 2602 49 36 162 58.0 % 2546 44.4 % >>>> 17 Deep Fritz : 2591 26 20 605 54.1 % 2562 36.9 % >>>> 18 Ruffian 1.0.1 : 2587 46 32 220 51.4 % 2577 38.2 % >>>> 19 Ruffian Leiden2003 : 2583 38 54 160 48.4 % 2594 38.1 % >>>> 20 List 504 : 2580 28 45 230 48.9 % 2587 46.5 % >>>> >>> >>>Did Ruffian Leiden play with general.ctg? >> >>>>All Ruffian Leiden games with Leiden book at 30'/40+30'/40+15' >> >>> Ruffian Leiden has comparable performance with Ruffian 1.01? I have analysed >>>with those two engines some games and i've seen that Ruffian Leiden is MUCH >>>better than Ruffian 1.01. So the result of it must be unlucky if there is such a >>>word for chess. I hope in the next games it's performance to be improved. >>> As i'm too lazy to look at your previous posts to see how Ruffian 1.01 >>>performed against all other programs, can you post it's statistics here please? >> >>(18) Ruffian 1.0.1 : 220 (+ 71,= 84,- 65), 51.4 % >> >>Hiarcs 7.32 : 10 (+ 4,= 3,- 3), 55.0 % >>Chess Tiger 14.0 : 10 (+ 3,= 2,- 5), 40.0 % >>Gambit Tiger 2.0 : 10 (+ 4,= 2,- 4), 50.0 % >>Goliath Light 1.5 : 10 (+ 8,= 1,- 1), 85.0 % >>Deep Junior 7 : 10 (+ 3,= 2,- 5), 40.0 % >>Fritz 7 : 10 (+ 6,= 1,- 3), 65.0 % >>Gandalf 5.1 : 10 (+ 3,= 4,- 3), 50.0 % >>Shredder 6 : 10 (+ 3,= 3,- 4), 45.0 % >>Tiger 15 normal style : 10 (+ 1,= 4,- 5), 30.0 % >>Hiarcs 8 : 10 (+ 5,= 3,- 2), 65.0 % >>Shredder Paderborn : 20 (+ 5,= 8,- 7), 45.0 % >>Crafty 18.15 : 10 (+ 4,= 5,- 1), 65.0 % >>Deep Fritz 7 : 10 (+ 0,= 5,- 5), 25.0 % >>Chessmaster 9000 : 20 (+ 6,= 8,- 6), 50.0 % >>Tiger 15 gambit agressive : 10 (+ 2,= 3,- 5), 35.0 % >>Fritz 8 : 20 (+ 4,= 14,- 2), 55.0 % >>Deep Sjeng 1.0 : 10 (+ 7,= 3,- 0), 85.0 % >>List 504 : 10 (+ 2,= 6,- 2), 50.0 % >>Hiarcs 9 : 10 (+ 1,= 7,- 2), 45.0 % >> >> >>Sarah. > >Hi, > >bad results vs. Chess Tiger but with more time Ruffian killed ChessTiger 14, 15. >Chess Tiger is a strong program for fast games but a good program must be played >with every time controls strong (the words by Christophe Theron). Unfortunatly, >Ruffian is in Blitz not very strong ... > >Best >Frank I'm not sure if you're talking about the NEW results of Ruffian Leiden or these of 1.0.1 which are probably a year old. If you look close enough you'll probably see that Hiarcs is what destroyed Leiden. Either way Ruffian won your tourney at 10'/40 most of mine are at 60' 3" the Leiden engine games were at 30'/40+30'/40+15. So personally I doubt there would be much difference between 120'/40 on the SSDF's 1200's or mine ran at 30'/40 but I guess time will tell. But IMO 2.0.0 is the strongest version. Also I'm not sure I understand what your trying to say re Chess Tiger. If it's that it's better in blitz than standard then while I don't agree, I'll add that the games played against all Ruffian versions IMO are not blitz. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.